Home

US court says Guantanamo detainees not enemy combatants

Toronto News.Net
Monday 23rd June, 2008 (Michael Bowman - VOA)

A U.S. federal appeals court has struck down the U.S. military's classification of a Guantanamo Bay detainee as an enemy combatant.

This is the first time the U.S. court system has overruled the Bush administration's designation of a detainee since the Guantanamo facility began operations in early 2002.

The court ruled in favor of a Chinese Muslim, Huzaifa Parhat, who has spent the last six years in detention and is one of more than 100 detainees to challenge their enemy combatant status in the U.S. judicial system. The court directed the U.S. military to release Parhat, transfer him out of Guantanamo, or hold a new proceeding to once again determine his status.

The court announced its decision without providing any details, saying the ruling contains classified information. The Department of Defense did not immediately comment on the matter.

Human rights groups say the appeals court ruling is a landmark decision for Guantanamo detainees, yet one with little practical benefit for Parhat.

Stacy Sullivan is a counter-terrorism advisor for New York-based Human Rights Watch.

"He [Parhat] will probably not be released," she said. "He is a Chinese Uighur, and there are a number of Chinese Uighurs being held at Guantanamo who are already declared no longer enemy combatants. But they cannot leave Guantanamo because they have nowhere to go. They cannot be sent back to China because they have a well-founded fear of torture [in China], and the United States to its credit will not send them back there. So the Uighurs are pretty much stuck in Guantanamo."

In 2006, the United States released five Uighurs from Guantanamo and resettled them in Albania. China, which regards the Uighurs as terrorists and separatists, demanded Albania to return them to China. Albania did not comply.

U.S. authorities believe some Uighurs have links to al-Qaeda. But they admit the Uighurs held at Guantanamo never fought against the United States, nor did they take part in the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington.

Human Rights Watch's Stacy Sullivan says the plight of the Guantanamo Uighurs points to a real dilemma facing the United States if at some point it decides to close Guantanamo, an action favored by both presumptive Republican and Democratic presidential nominees.

"There are about 50 detainees there who have said they do not want to go home because they fear being tortured: Uzbeks, Libyans, Uighurs, a few other nationalities," she said. "What is to be done with them? It is simple enough to transfer those for whom we have evidence of terrorism and try them in our federal court system. But the 50 detainees who cannot go home, it is unclear what is going to happen to them, and that is going to make closing Guantanamo really difficult."

The federal appeals court ruling follows a U.S. Supreme Court decision earlier this month affirming the right of Guantanamo suspects to challenge their detention in U.S. civilian courts.

Email this story to a friend



Comments on this story

wacama
06-23-08, 06:30 PM

Guantanamo detainees not enemy combatants, says U.S. court

I still believed they should send back to the countryt of thier origin.I suppose it is not our problem anymore if the court decide to let them go free and deport them to thier country of origin. Let them deal with them.iF THE COURT say let them go ,itis the responsibility of the court not the military authorities anymore.If the human right activities felt it is not just,let them take care of them.Somehow or another somebody must take responsible for them period

Osama Saladin
06-23-08, 09:33 PM

The U.S will have to pay compo and keep all there so called enemy combatants.
LOL!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous
06-24-08, 12:09 AM

There is no dilema,only hypochrite

The New york based Human Right Watch is fighting for their release then they should sponsred their stay in the US as compensation to their faulty capture in Afghanistan war zone. They are inoocent good guy anyway, why worry. US accepted thousand of refugees everyyear, why not these few?

Osama Saladin
06-24-08, 12:15 AM

Where are the the people who organised 9/11?
It is time to have a true investigation into 9/11???

Anonymous
06-24-08, 08:00 AM

Bush is is still comeing second in the lead for TOP CRUSADER Hitler was alot more succsesful.

ozball
06-24-08, 02:54 AM

US mornarchy

Under its crusading monarchy rule , America has even abandoned habeas corpus a basic for the rule of law in modern civilisation .

Osama is right that other Osama said he was not responsible for organising 9/11.Even the FBI after years of investigative/cover up now says it has no evidence or charges against Bin laden in regard to 9/11

So it looks like the FBI are proving that bin laden may have been telling the truth.

Unlike the other guy -WMD âSaddam connections to Al queda etc-a proven liar.

Check that out !search the internet on fbi charges against bin laden on 9/11.

So the whole war in Afghanistan was waged on the basis of lies for carrying out imperialist regime change. Any âsuspectsâ caught by the US have no rights of habeas corpus or even Geneva convention .Just declared âememy combatantsâ the worst of the worst and locked up in limbo so they can be subjected to torture or ârenditionâ.

After creating hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent refugees in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as these prisoners , âWacamaâ and âunregisteredâ should check out how many- ACTUAL NUMBERS- of these refugees from American violence justified by American lies America actually accepts instead of patting themselves on Americas backside and whingeing about imaginary levels of high costs.
This Atheist says it is nonsense to turn that reality that into questions of religious point scoring in a game of religious pointscoring to justify a war to terrorise inocent people.


Have your say on this story

Your name/nickname (optional)
Message title
Message
Top Stories